This page was created with Microsoft Word 2002 (Office XP) and converted to HTML with GIF images using MathType 5's MathPage technology. Note the following in the document below:

Equations are properly aligned in text and do not interfere with line spacing.
Your browser's screen resolution was automatically detected for the appropriate size equation image to appear on-screen.
Click on any equation below to see a demonstration of our new MathZoom™ technology. The equation will enlarge 150%; click again and the equation goes back to its original size.
The equations will print at 300 dpi
You can save any equation below by dragging & dropping or copy/paste into your copy of MathType.

Compare this to a Web page created with Word's Save As Web Page feature.

Equivalent plane strain solution

The theory of consolidation of vertical drains under axisymmetric conditions has gained wide acceptance in geotechnical engineering because of its simplicity. According to Hansbo (1981), for axisymmetric flow the average degree of consolidation on a horizontal plane at a depth z and at time t may be predicted from

[1]

where is the time factor, and the effect of smear and well resistance (μ) is given by

[2]

In the above, where R is the radius of the influence zone of the drain and is the radius of the drain; where is the radius of the smear; l is the length of the drain having one-way drainage or half this value for two-way drainage; z is the depth of the drain under consideration; is the discharge capacity of the drain; and are the coefficients of horizontal permeability outside and inside the smeared zone, respectively.

In equation [2], the final term represents the well resistance, which is a function of the drain length l and depth z for and is inversely proportional to the drain discharge capacity .

Indraratna and Redana (1997) showed that the degree of consolidation at a depth z in plane strain condition can be represented by

[3]

where is the initial pore pressure, is the pore pressure at time t (average values), is time factor in plane strain, and

[4]

where and are the undisturbed horizontal and corresponding smear zone permeabilities, respectively. Ignoring higher order terms, the geometric parameters α and β and the flow term θ are given by

			[5]
				[6]

and

[7]

where is the equivalent plane strain discharge capacity of the drain, and dimensions are defined in Figure 1.

At a given stress level, to maintain the same degree of consolidation at each time step, the average degree of consolidation for both axisymmetric and equivalent plain strain conditions are made equal, hence

[8]

Combining equations [3] and [8] with the original Hansbo (1981) theory (equation [1]) defines the time factor ratio by the following equation:

[9]

Indraratna and Redana (1997) showed that if the radius of the axisymmetric influence zone of a single drain (R) were taken to be the same as the half-width (B) in plain strain, then the relationship between and is given by

[10]

If both the smear and well resistance are ignored, then the simplified ratio of plane strain to axisymmetric horizontal permeability is represented by

[11]

If the effect of well resistance is ignored, the permeability in the smear zone can be isolated by neglecting the final terms of the denominator and numerator in equation [10] to give

[12]